Outubro 29, 2004

Lake Constance is historical ships' graveyard

IOL, October 19 2004

Constance, Germany - Archaeologists believe Lake Constance is a huge ships' graveyard for historical vessels dating back to ancient times.

Martin Mainberger of the regional office for the preservation of historical monuments said Tuesday 50 shipwrecks have already been identified in Lake Ueberling, a northern arm of Lake Constance.

Underwater archaeologists from Europe and the United States are currently meeting at Constance in southern Germany as part of an international conference on underwater archaeology in Zurich.

The experts are unsure how many ships may be lying on the bed of Lake Constance which borders Germany, Switzerland and Austria.

Researchers only began to realise just what historical treasures were hidden in the lake when a 14th-century load sailboat was discovered in 1992 at the northern bank near Immenstaad.

"It is only a question of time before an antique ship from Roman times is found," said archaeologist Helmut Schlichtherle. Even dug-out canoes dating back more than 2 000 years could be on the bed, he said.



Hurricane unburies beach treasure, yields precious coins

The Orlando Sentinel, on Mon, Oct. 25, 2004

by RICH MCKAY

INDIALANTIC, Fla. - (KRT) - It is the stuff of pirate legends, but do not waste your breath asking Joel Ruth on what stretch of Florida's Treasure Coast he found his hoard of Spanish pieces of eight - waiting to be scratched out of the sand with bare fingers and toes.

Treasure hunters guard their secrets.

Especially, if like Ruth, they have just found about 180 near-mint silver coins worth more than $40,000.

To most Floridians, hurricane season is the time to board up windows and dread the worst. But to professional and amateur treasure seekers, it is the time to hit the beaches and hunt lost riches.

"It's why we're called the Treasure Coast," said Ruth, a bookish 52-year-old marine archaeologist with an African parrot named Euclid who has learned to squawk "Pieces o' eight."

It takes the big storms like Jeanne and Frances to rake several feet of sand off the beaches and dunes and expose gold, silver and gems sunk and scattered centuries ago.

But making a find takes more than walking the beaches with a metal detector. What separates those who make a real find from the legions of beachcombers is knowledge and patience, said Sir Robert F. Marx.

Marx is an underwater archaeologist and marine historian who was knighted by both the Spanish and English crowns for his work, including about 800 popular and scientific articles and about 60 books.

His colleague Ruth, for instance, has been keeping his eye on a certain stretch of beach in Brevard County, Fla., for 20 years, checking it every so often as the years go by, Marx said. He and Ruth think the find is part of a sunken treasure fleet off Florida's Atlantic coast.

But it took Jeanne to bring a slice of the shoreline back to where it was in 1715, he said.

That is the year a famous Spanish treasure fleet of about a dozen ships sunk in a summer hurricane, bloated with treasure headed for Philip V of Spain, Marx said.

Captain-General Don Juan Esteban de Ubilla, commander of the flotilla carrying gems, gold, silver and porcelain from China - hence the name Plate Fleet - set sail in the late summer 289 years ago.

Under pressure from the king to bring treasure to boost a war-ravaged economy, Ubilla set sail even though hurricane season had already started. Leading with the Capitana, the fleet hugged Florida's Atlantic coast, heading north in the hopes of catching the trade winds of the Gulf Stream. With no more warning than a morning of steel-gray skies, a tempest snapped the ships like matchsticks, a few survivors would later tell.

Nautical records of salvage attempts and previous finds pointed to the spot Ruth staked out to search. Others know the spot and have made finds there, too.

The basic rules of treasure hunting on beaches include finders keepers, but do not dig into the dunes or in protected areas.

Because riches go to those who are there first, "You have to be Johnny on the spot," said Mitch King, vice president of the Treasure Coast Archaeological Society.

"(Hurricane) Jeanne did more destruction than any storm has in years," King said. The last storm to yield finds like Ruth's happened on Thanksgiving about two decades ago, he added. Treasure hunters still whisper about it.

And you have to be quick, Ruth said, because the high tides right after a storm often dump several feet of sand back on the same beaches, leaving the heavy treasure well below the reach of most metal detectors.

"You could be walking over a million dollars in coins and never know it," said Ruth, who makes a living on salvage efforts and identifying and restoring ancient coins.

He headed out with his metal detector about 8 a.m. Sept. 26, when Jeanne's winds started slacking off. He knew the storm that brought some of the worst destruction to Florida's coast could also yield the most riches.

He would not say where he went other than "somewhere in Brevard." He shimmied down to the beach from a place where there is access - and knew right away it was a good spot. There was no modern trash - and the waves had cut deep into the sand.

"I made a find almost immediately - a big green (piece of) eight," he said.

It was green from age but was not worn or corroded, which told him the coin spent most of the time deep under the protection of the sand - making it far more valuable to collectors.

Ruth stayed for about four hours, filling his pockets with coins until his batteries were about dead and the high tides' waves bashed him against the sandy cliffs.

He went back the next day, but there was too much sand piled up. He did not find a thing, other than modern rubbish.

He showed his find to Marx, who smiled with approval and the respect of a fellow hunter. Although many marine archaeologists would call them "plunderers," professional treasure hunters say they give more discoveries to museums and make more historical finds because their ventures pay for new searches a life in academics could not finance.

And where does Ruth find the coins? "I'm sworn to secrecy," Marx said.

But if another storm hits before hurricane season ends Nov. 30, he will probably go back.



Unesco's 'blue berets' to rescue cultural treasures

The Guardian, by John Hooper in Rome, Thursday October 28, 2004

The United Nations yesterday announced the creation of a new kind of rapid reaction force to step in wherever art treasures are threatened by war or natural disaster.
The "cultural blue berets", as they are already being called, will initially be formed entirely of Italians and could include members of Italy's paramilitary police, the carabinieri.

Yesterday's move followed international outrage over the looting of priceless antiquities during the US-led coalition's invasion of Iraq last year.

But the absence of an internationally agreed plan for protecting mankind's cultural heritage was also underlined last December when an earthquake struck the city of Bam in south-eastern Iran, severely damaging the nearby, 2,000-year-old mud-brick citadel.

The UN arts and sciences agency, Unesco, said it had signed an agreement with the Italian government for the "safeguarding, restoration and protection of the natural and cultural heritage of countries affected by conflict or natural catastrophe".

According to a report in the newspaper Corriere della Sera yesterday, the agreement provided for the involvement of engineers, architects, archaeologists, art historians, restorers, geologists, seismologists, book conservation specialists and experts in the illegal trafficking of art works.

The Paris-based organisation said in a statement it was the first such agreement with a member state.

The world body is hoping other countries will agree similar deals to make available even more expertise. But Italy alone can supply a vast range of skills and experience, and following the establishment of a provisional administration in Baghdad, Italy was given responsibility for protecting and restoring Iraq's cultural heritage.

Italian officials have already worked with Unesco on projects requiring a swift response. Last year, a Pavia University professor, Giorgio Macchi, who had advised on the stabilisation of the leaning Tower of Pisa, was called in to help prevent the imminent collapse of a minaret at Herat in Afghanistan.

The Italian culture minister, Giuliano Urbani, said: "The experience that Unesco and Italy have shared in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Egypt and the countries of the Maghreb is the plinth upon which this agreement has been erected."

Unesco's director-general, Koichiro Matsuura, said it was his agency's job "not only to prevent destruction, but also to contribute assistance for reconstruction". Mr Matsuura said Unesco was "being called on more and more often to intervene as a matter of urgency".

Under the terms of the plan, the government of the affected country will first contact Unesco. If officials in Paris judge the case to be sufficiently serious and urgent, they will then get in touch with Rome and ask for the setting up of an ad hoc team - to be called the emergency action group - to deal with the damage or threat.

Italian officials said that, depending on circumstances, the group could be made up of civilian experts, civil defence officials and/or members of the carabinieri's specialist art works recovery squad.

Mr Urbani said the coordinator of the UN's cultural blue berets would be Giuseppe Proietti, a senior official of his ministry.

In May 2003, Mr Proietti was made senior adviser to the office responsible for finding and restoring Iraq's missing antiquities. As Baghdad fell to US forces the previous month, looters pillaged the National Museum, which housed one of the Middle East's leading archaeological collections.

The terms of reference of Unesco's emergency action group suggest it would not have been able to prevent the looting, however, since at the time there was no functioning government able to call on Unesco to act.



Offshore find dates to King David's time


by Matthew Kalman, SFGate

Chronicle Foreign Service, Thursday, October 28, 2004


Hof Dor, Israel -- An archaeologist's dog may have discovered the first ship ever found from the period of King David and his son, Solomon, who ruled the holy land 3, 000 ago.

The remains, which have been carbon-dated to the ninth century B.C., include a huge stone anchor believed to be the largest ever unearthed. The wreckage is lying under a few inches of sand off the Mediterranean coast in shallow waters, and has yet to be examined extensively.

If the remains are indeed 3,000 years old, it would be the first archaeological artifact ever found from the era of the first kings of Israel, with the possible exception of several huge stones at the base of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

The discovery was made by a dog, according to marine archaeologist Kurt Raveh.

"My dog Petal led me to an enormous stone anchor -- the biggest in the world," said Raveh. "He was swimming, started to drown, and was suddenly standing above the water. We couldn't understand how, so we went to check what he was standing on, and out of the sands came an enormous stone anchor."

Raveh, who has studied more than 200 stone anchors, said he discovered the huge anchor -- 8.2 feet long, almost 6.5 feet wide and 1.6 feet thick --

during the summer near his home in Hof Dor, about 25 miles north of Tel Aviv.

Named for Dorus, son of the Greek sea god Poseidon, the hillside city was a major port for both conquerors and traders and is mentioned in the first Book of Kings. At its peak, the port had 200,000 residents.

In the past 30 years, Raveh has discovered 23 shipwrecks spanning more than 15 centuries off Hof Dor's natural harbor, including vessels made by the Canaanites, Byzantines, Persians, Mamaluks and French. His past discoveries include ancient coins, a gold cup, Crusader swords and cannons ditched by Napoleon to make room for horses so he could move his sick and wounded soldiers.

"In King Solomon's time, this was the major port for the Israelite kingdom," said ancient boat specialist Yaacov Kahanov of Haifa University. "The island here off the coast is still called Taphath, after Solomon's daughter."

Raveh also excavated the world-famous 27-foot by 7 1/2-foot "Jesus boat" discovered in 1986 by two fishermen on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, where the Bible says Jesus walked on water. Archaeologists carbon-dated that vessel to the first century and believe it may have sunk in fighting between Jews and Romans.

On Tuesday, Raveh said he found the anchor and wooden beams that appear to be the King David-era boat's keel as he probed the shallow waters.

"I took a little piece of wood and sent it to laboratories in Switzerland. This week we got it back, and it turned out to be from the time of David and Solomon, 3,000 years old," he said.

The carbon-14 test from the Institute for Particle Physics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich dated the wood between 997 and 806 B. C. That would overlap with the rule of the ancient House of David, which governed the first united kingdom of Israel from 1,000 to 925 B.C.

This week, Raveh and a team from nearby Haifa University led by Kahanov will try to uncover the vessel for the first time in three millennia.

"Now we want to know if the wood is just beams or there is also a shipwreck from the time of King Solomon," Raveh said.

The team will also examine two Byzantine shipwrecks lying about 54 yards off shore. So far, they have pulled up dozens of coins, pieces of pottery and glass vessels that went down with the two ships, which have been dated to the 5th and 7th centuries A.D.

The archaeologists believe many more wrecks are buried inland, where the harbor once extended.




Outubro 26, 2004

Contra la corriente

Semana, 26 de Octobre 2004



Tatiana Villegas, experta en arqueología submarina, defiende el proyecto de ley de patrimonio sumergido que entra a debate en el Senado esta semana.

Por Tatiana Villegas Zamora*

Detrás de las críticas al proyecto de ley sobre patrimonio sumergido que cursa en el Congreso se escudan los intereses de los cazatesoros que quieren saquear el patrimonio cultural.

El futuro del patrimonio subacuático en Colombia viene siendo objeto de un amplio debate desde hace algunos meses. La prensa nacional ha seguido de cerca la polémica alrededor del proyecto de ley radicado por el Ministerio de Cultura en el Congreso que pretende regular la materia y que ha encontrado un arduo debate a su paso por el Senado. Teniendo en cuenta que la mayor parte de la opinión ha expresado hasta ahora una abierta oposición al proyecto, quisiera esclarecer, como experta en arqueología subacuática, algunos conceptos ampliamente compartidos por la comunidad científica internacional que espero puedan despejar algunas confusiones sobre los aspectos científicos y técnicos de la cuestión y demostrar que el debate actual en Colombia es de otro orden.

Para empezar, el proyecto de ley presentado por el gobierno declara que el patrimonio cultural sumergido es inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable. Los argumentos opuestos tratan de excluir ciertos elementos del patrimonio de este marco, a pesar de que la integridad del patrimonio no se puede discutir. Nadie aceptaría que una isla del territorio nacional, aunque pequeña y sin recursos, fuese vendida a otro Estado con el pretexto de que este le aseguraría un mejor desarrollo económico o ambiental, como inaceptable es también legislar para facilitar la negociación en el mercado internacional de piezas pertenecientes a las culturas Quimbaya o Calima con el pretexto de que se han encontrado en numerosas cantidades. Del mismo modo no puede asegurarse que los lingotes de oro hallados en un galeón son susceptibles de ser separados del conjunto de elementos con los que se hundió.

Todo argumento en esta dirección pone en tela de juicio la propia soberanía del Estado, a la cual no le caben reservas de ninguna índole. Un Estado que defienda los intereses nacionales sobre el patrimonio cultural sumergido no puede tolerar leyes que dejen lagunas jurídicas al servicio de los cazadores de tesoros financiados por inversionistas extranjeros, cuyo único propósito es encontrar vías de interpretación legal para saquear nuestro patrimonio.

También es importante insistir en el hecho de que el patrimonio cultural sumergido no es un recurso natural y no es renovable. Un barco es una burbuja de tiempo. Todo cuanto se encontraba abordo en el momento de su hundimiento es contemporáneo y tanto el zapato del marinero como el lingote de oro contienen información vital sobre nuestro pasado y sobre los eventos que ocurrieron durante la vida de esa embarcación. Desde el punto de vista arqueológico, todo vestigio es potencial de información y parte integrante del sitio. La totalidad de la información es crucial.

Otro aspecto que diferencia los proyectos con fines lucrativos de aquellos en que la prioridad es el estudio arqueológico se refiere al interés por la construcción naval. Este admirable trabajo de ingeniería, constante en la historia de la humanidad, evidencia grandes vacíos ya que durante muchos años no se llevaron registros escritos. El estudio arqueológico de la estructura del navío es primordial para comprender las técnicas de construcción y establecer hipótesis de comparación con las embarcaciones encontradas en otros lugares del planeta. Hasta hoy, ninguna exploración con fines económicos ha hecho un trabajo serio de registro de la estructura en madera, ya que se trata de un análisis minucioso que va en contra de las exigencias de beneficio financiero inmediato impuestas por los inversionistas.

Existe también una gran confusión sobre el presupuesto necesario para la exploración arqueológica submarina. No se necesitan millones de dólares para poner en marcha una buena investigación arqueológica. Con un presupuesto modesto es posible que un buen equipo de arqueólogos submarinos y buzos voluntarios, sumados al apoyo de las instituciones del Estado, puedan emprender labores exitosas sin el apremio del tiempo. Aquí reitero el aspecto primordial que diferencia los proyectos con fines científicos de aquellos con fines económicos. Cuando el motivo principal es obtener objetos que se puedan negociar en las grandes subastas internacionales para el enriquecimiento de algunos, la investigación arqueológica se ve subyugada a los intereses financieros ya que la relación entre los conceptos de tiempo, rendimiento y exigencia científica no es la misma.

Desde que empezó a sonar el controvertido caso del galeón San José, el gobierno colombiano ha extremado las medidas de protección del patrimonio sumergido. Esta posición de prudencia ha contribuido a su salvaguardia. En mi opinión, el hecho de no haber concedido permisos a diestra y siniestra 'para salvar los barcos en peligro' ha facilitado su conservación natural. Gracias a esta posición de firmeza ante el eminente asedio de los cazadores de tesoros, cuya presión y codicia es alarmante, el patrimonio colombiano se encuentra a salvo.

Como dije, los aspectos técnicos no son lo más importante en el debate. La estrategia de los opositores al proyecto de ley del gobierno tiene como objetivo crear un marco que permita a los inversionistas privados explotar nuestro patrimonio sumergido con fines lucrativos, pretextando confusas razones técnicas carentes de rigor académico o científico. El argumento de que nuestro país no está capacitado para ocuparse de inventariar y estudiar este patrimonio me parece infundado y ofensivo. Creo sinceramente que es posible desarrollar la arqueología subacuática en Colombia a través de las instituciones universitarias, con la colaboración de las entidades del Estado e, igualmente, del lado de la comunidad marítima: marinos, pescadores, buzos y poblaciones costeras son indudablemente los mejores aliados del patrimonio sumergido. El patrimonio debe ser explotado en beneficio del interés general, y el Congreso colombiano se enfrenta ahora a la responsabilidad de decidir si nuestro país se une a ese interés o si navega contra corriente.

* Experta en arqueología subacuática



Outubro 19, 2004

Cannon found from likely Blackbeard wreck

CNN, Friday, October 8, 2004

BEAUFORT, North Carolina (AP) -- Underwater archaeologists have found another cannon from the wreckage of what they believe was the flagship of the notorious pirate Blackbeard.

Historical records indicate Blackbeard had 40 guns on the French frigate he captured in 1717 and renamed Queen Anne's Revenge. Since 1996, when the wreckage of the ship was discovered in Beaufort Inlet, divers have found 22 at the site.

"We're pretty positive that we have cannon number 23," said project archaeologist Chris Southerly.

It is a large cannon that probably shot a 6-pound or 8-pound ball, Southerly said. Divers uncovered the cannon while excavating an area of the shipwreck's northwest side where they had not previously dug.

Divers also found a concretion with chain and part of the mast rigging, and a 9- to 10-inch-diameter cast iron kettle. A concretion is a mineral buildup usually found in rock.

The dig, which began Monday, was a second priority for the divers, whose main goal was to survey the shipwreck site for storm damage. They found several scoured areas, likely the result of recent hurricanes, Southerly said.



Firm salvaging Titanic finds new debris


By TIM MCGLONE, The Virginian-Pilot, October 7, 2004

NORFOLK — The company that owns the rights to salvage the famed Titanic has completed its seventh voyage to the wreck site, discovering a new field of artifacts from one of the ship’s restaurants including a fully intact champagne bottle.

The future of the company, however, remains mired in a court battle that, once again, has been stalled.

The outcome of that case will determine how much the company and its shareholders will profit from the millions invested on those expeditions.

A hearing in Norfolk’s federal court, scheduled for Oct. 18, has been postponed pending a decision by an appeals court that will chart the course of the case to its conclusion.

The appeals court will hear the case between Nov. 30 and Dec. 3.

R.M.S. Titanic Inc., the Atlanta company that holds sole rights to salvage the wreck, informed Norfolk’s U.S. District Court last week that the company had just completed its seventh expedition.

Salvagers, including company president Arnie Geller, set out from Nova Scotia in August and returned about two weeks ago with 75 artifacts from the wreck site two miles under the North Atlantic.

Calling the journey “an overwhelming success,” the report to the court said a previously unknown debris field was discovered south of the ship’s stern.

The field contained mostly remnants of the ship’s first-class A La Carte Restaurant, including the champagne bottle, a milk scalder and a wall sconce.

Other items recovered include decorative pieces of the grand staircase, Turkish bath tile, a crystal decanter, bed fragments and various unidentified pieces containing copper, bronze, brass, porcelain, wood and leather.

The items will be cleaned and incorporated into the company’s traveling Titanic exhibitions, currently stopped in Salt Lake City, Philadelphia and Manchester, England.

Geller was not available for comment Wednesday and the company attorney in Portsmouth declined to comment.

The Titanic, arguably the world’s most famous luxury liner and the subject of a blockbuster 1997 movie, sank on its maiden voyage in 1912, killing more than 1,500 passengers and crew.

The wreck was discovered in 1985.

Through federal court proceedings in Norfolk, R.M.S. Titanic Inc. obtained the rights to salvage the wreck.

In the seven expeditions undertaken since 1987, R.M.S. Titanic has raised more than 6,000 pieces, including a large section of the hull.

The company estimated the value of the artifacts at $71 million and is seeking a salvage award of $225 million or ownership of the artifacts.

Federal judges in Norfolk have kept a tight rein on the objects, forbidding the company from selling anything but bits of coal.

The company has petitioned the federal appeals court in Richmond to overturn a Norfolk judge’s decision forbidding the company from taking full title of the objects.

Judge Rebecca B. Smith ruled in August that she will allow a hearing on a salvage award, which is essentially a payment for the company’s investment in the project.

It remains unclear how that award would be paid.

Interest in Titanic objects remains high.

A letter written and mailed by a Titanic passenger just prior to departure sold at a London auction this year for $24,000 after an intense bidding war.

The price was double its appraisal, according to a Titanic Web site.




Outubro 14, 2004

British Whaling Shipwrecks Believed Found


By JAYMES SONG, Associated Press Writer Thu Sep 30, 2004

HONOLULU - In what is being called a "mind-blowing" discovery, divers have found anchors, cauldrons and cannonballs near a remote Hawaiian atoll where two British whaling ships were lost nearly two centuries ago.

If the debris is confirmed to have come from the two ships that sank in 1822, it would be the earliest Western shipwreck discovered in the Hawaiian Islands, said maritime heritage coordinator Hans Van Tilburg.

Divers with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration came upon the wreckage on Sept. 20 while removing marine debris from reefs on Pearl and Hermes Atoll in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, 1,210 miles northwest of Honolulu.

"Holy cow, this is amazing, there's a wreck here!" diver Susanna Holst said over the radio as she spotted the wreckage.

Pearl and Hermes Atoll was named for the two lost ships, which were traveling together when the Pearl struck a reef on April 24, 1822. The Hermes rushed to help and struck the reef itself. Crew members from both ships swam ashore and were later rescued.

The debris, scattered across almost 700 yards of reef and ocean floor, clearly came from a whaling vessel, and there are no records of any other whaling losses at the atoll, officials said.

Among the items were anchors, large cauldrons used to process whale oil, metal hardware and pieces of a wooden ship. Also found were cannons and cannonballs, and other gear for hunting and processing whales.

"It's amazing how much of this vessel is still here after almost 200 years," said Randy Kosaki of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve. "Giant copper pots, nails, cannon, metal fittings even wooden timbers remarkably preserved here in crystal clear water."

Holst said the unexpected discovery is "mind-blowing."

"We were just doing our job, who could have imagined that we'd find these wrecks?" she said.

The wreckage is now being surveyed by teams of researchers.

The Northwestern Hawaiian Island chain, known for its low and poorly charted reefs, is a vast 1,200-mile archipelago of water, islands, atolls and shoals. It begins about 140 miles west of the main Hawaiian Islands.

Some 14 million seabirds nest there and about 70 percent of all coral reefs in the United States are in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.



Outubro 13, 2004

No Brasil: Recuperado navio que naufragou com açorianos

Diário Insular, 13 de Outubro de 2004


Um dos maiores especialistas do mundo em arqueologia subaquática, Dwight Coleman, que participou das buscas dos destroços do Titanic, vai tentar recuperar oito navios naufragados na costa brasileira entre os séculos XVI e XVII, foi ontem anunciado.

Entre as embarcações está a do espanhol Juan Dias Solis, considerado o descobridor da Baía do Rio Prata, que naufragou no litoral do estado de Santa Catarina, na região Sul do Brasil. O naufrágio ocorreu em 1753, quando a embarcação transportava cerca de 250 imigrantes açorianos de Santa Catarina para Porto Alegre, tendo sobrevivido apenas 77 pessoas.

A busca por destroços de navios na costa brasileira é um projecto desenvolvido pelo Instituto de Pesquisas Oceanográficas Sólis-Cabotto, a ser lançado oficialmente no dia 16, em Santa Catarina.



Outubro 01, 2004

Second CPNS Maritime Archaeology Conference

FIRST NOTIFICATION [September 2004]

Venue: Mossel Bay, South Africa
Date: March 2006

Theme: Portuguese Maritime history during the Carreira da India period

Wednesday to Sunday: 5 days (Will probably be reduced to 3 days with parallel sessions)

Day 1: Trade Ceramics
Day 2: Trade Goods
Day 3: The Portuguese ship and Workshops
Day 4 Maritime Archaeology – Local and international projects, Museums, Legislation, Discipline
Day 5: Naval Artillery and Navigation





Day 1: Trade Ceramics

Chinese export Porcelain : Identification & Dating
Earthenware for export and shipboard use ie Marteban
Manufacturing processes
History of export trade and manufacturing/production sites/kilns
Conservation and restoration of ‘shipwreck’ porcelain

Day 2: Archival research and Trade Goods

Archival research
Spices
Beads
Money Cowries
Misc


Day 3: The Portuguese Ship & Afternoon Workshops 15h00 – 18h00

Ship Types
Ship construction and re-construction
Ship components and shipboard items
-Anchors
-Rigging
-Pumps
-Personal items
Life on board the Portuguese ship



Workshops: Friday Afternoon 15h00 – 19h00

Rigging, Sails and Sailing for dummies – sailing excursion (Max 10 persons)
Porcelain Repair workshop: (Max 20 persons)
Porcelain Identification workshop: (Max 20 persons)
Practical Navigation workshop [Astrolabe and other instrument of the period]: (Max: 20 persons)
Workshop and Demonstration on Gun (cannon) firing: (Max: 20 persons)
Underwater photography workshop [on land]: (Max: 20 persons)
Shark [Cage] diving: (Max 10 persons)

Those not attending workshops could go on a tour of the area or go scuba diving in the area.

Day 4: Maritime Archaeology

Maritime Archaeology as a discipline
International and local Projects
South African Shipwreck and Survivor sites
Survivor sites
The role of the Museum in Maritime Archaeology
Preservation and Restoration of artefacts
Legislation
Search and Survey: Techniques and Equipment



Day 5: Naval Artillery, Navigation and Cartography/Maps

History of Cartography and Maps
Maps and their use during the age of discovery

Types of Artillery used
-Guns/Cannons
-Gunners equipment and area on the gun-deck
-Ammunition
Identification
Manufacturing/Casting

Navigational Equipment
Navigational Techniques
History of Navigation


Anybody interested in Speaking at the conference are asked to contact us asap and provide us with a suggested topic. You will be under no obligation to attend or speak but we need some input to start planning the program. You are welcome to suggest any topic relevant to Portuguese Maritime History during the period and also to suggested additional workshops you would be interested in attending or presenting.

We are specifically interested in discussing the following or answering the following questions about Portuguese Maritime History and the Portuguese ship of the period:



1. Money Cowries (Cypreae moneta) found on the shipwrecks. Where were they collected, where were they taken, how were they used/traded. These cowries are found on homeward bound ships – what happened to the cowries when they reached Lisbon?

2. Carnelian (Agate) Beads. Same questions as above.

3. The Mozambique channel and Mozambique island. Routes and ports of call and trade at each of these ports. What were .loaded/traded where along the route – outward and homeward bound at ports other than those of the ‘official’ Indian Ports.

4. The Portuguese ship. Nau vs Galleon vs Carrack vs Frigate

5. Cannon balls – stone vs metal including other ammonution and gun powder

6. Ballast.

7. The Portuguese ship – how and where were the trade goods stored/packed

8. Anchors

9. Shipbuilding – where were these ships built and woods used for different parts of the ship

10. India: Ports of call and trade at each port and origin of trade goods in India

11. Portugal: As above

12. Life on board: Pay / Food / Sleep – all factors relating to life on board for sailors/slaves and noblemen.

13. Cape of Storms – Oceanography and local factors that caused these ships to be wrecked along the South African east coast and Mozambique

14. Background information on the beginning of the age of exploration starting with Portugal at the end of the ‘dark ages’ and Prince Henry.

15. All factors relating to Chinese export Porcelain. Where and how was it manufactured, how stored and packed, where did it end up for sale in Europe etc

16. On board containers – food storage – Marteban and ceramic glass containers

Approx current [August 2004 R1-00 = 0.72 Euro = $ 0.66] Costs for budget purposes:

Local flights ex Jhb or CT to Mossel Bay: R1400-00
Accomodation: [3 * Hotel rate]: R200-00 per night
International registation: R400-00 per day
Workshops: [run as parallelsessions]: R150-00 each
Evening meals: R100 each
Banquet: [Portuguese evening]R250

Approx total cost for international participant attending all five days: Approx. R5500-00 / 800 Euro

International flight plus additional R4800-00, Approx 700 Euro (Sept2004)

Speakers will not be paid any honorarium except for free registration for the day in which they present. Registration include teas, snacks and lunch.

With this first notification we would like all interested parties to come forward with suggestions for this conference. We would like to give all the opportunity to visit our wonderful country and at the same time partake in a world class, one of a kind, conference. Post-conference proceedings will be published in scientific format. Plan now to bring along your family as well. Mossel Bay is in one of the prime tourist areas (“Garden Route”) and various pre- or post- conference outings will be suggested. This part of the country is tourist friendly and safe and for R250 per day a car could be rented and the area explored.

Send us an e-mail confirming your interest in attending as speaker and/or delegate and we will add you to the conference mailing list for updates.


We will provide additional/further information on our website as from January 2005.


Contact Information:

Paul Brandt
CPNS
Tel: +27 82 9402423
Fax: +27 12 3192436



Columbus may not be buried in Caribbean


CNN, 01 October 2004


MADRID, Spain (AP) -- Researchers who gleaned DNA from 500-year-old bone slivers said Friday that preliminary data suggests Christopher Columbus might be buried in Spain, rather than a rival tomb in the Dominican Republic, but for now they can't be sure.

The team said some DNA samples taken from bones that Spain says are the explorer's matched DNA from a body widely believed to be that of his brother Diego.

Both were unearthed in the southern Spanish city of Seville over the past two years as part of a pioneering high-tech experiment to settle a 100-year-old argument over whether Columbus is buried in Spain or the Dominican Republic, both of which boast ornate graves that purport to hold his remains.

But DNA degrades over time, and the genetic material the Spanish team analyzed is in awful shape. "It is degraded, it is contaminated and we don't have much of it," forensic geneticist Jose Antonio Lorente said.

Of the samples taken from the two purported Columbus brothers, 80 percent is indecipherable so far but 20 percent is identical. New techniques are needed to be able to use the other 80 percent.

"This is like halftime at a soccer game with the score 1-0. Do you know just because of that who is going to win? No, you don't," Lorente said.

Lorente was part of a research team that included two high school teachers and a forensic anthropologist who set out two years ago to settle the enigma over who has Columbus's corpse.

They dug up and extracted DNA material from at least three sets of bones: the one Spain claims came from Columbus, one historians are certain belong to his son Hernando and one that researchers believe is Columbus' brother Diego.

All three were buried in Seville: Hernando and his father in the cathedral that dominates the city's historic neighborhood, and Diego first in a chapel there, and then moved outside town in the 1990s.

Hernando is key because historians are convinced his bones were never moved after his 1539 burial.

Those of Columbus and his brother Diego were moved -- in Columbus' case repeatedly, leaving room for doubt as to where they finally ended up.

What's still missing is genetic material from the body buried in the Dominican capital Santo Domingo, where a sprawling, cross-shaped lighthouse called the Faro a Colon is also said to hold the remains of the explorer known in Spanish as Cristobal Colon.

Columbus died and was buried in the northern Spanish city of Valladolid on May 20, 1506. He had asked to be buried in the Americas, but no church of sufficient stature existed there.

Three years later his remains were moved to a monastery on La Cartuja, next to Seville. In 1537, Maria de Rojas y Toledo, widow of another of Columbus' sons, Diego, sent the bones of her husband and his father to the cathedral in Santo Domingo for burial. There they lay until 1795, when Spain ceded the island of Hispaniola to France and decided Columbus' remains should not fall into the hands of foreigners.

A set of remains that the Spaniards believed were Columbus' were first shipped to Havana, Cuba, and then back to Seville when the Spanish-American War broke out in 1898.

In 1877, however, workers digging in the Santo Domingo cathedral unearthed a leaden box containing bones and bearing the inscription, "Illustrious and distinguished male, don Cristobal Colon."

Claiming these are the genuine remains, the Dominicans say the Spaniards took the wrong body back in 1795.